When I find a creepy crawling thing in the house, I reach for something to scoop it up and carry it to freedom outdoors rather than grab a can of Raid or a heavy-heeled shoe. As a kid, I couldn't even zap ants with the sun's rays sharpened through a magnifying glass.I've just never felt as if I possessed a single sadistic bone in my body -- until now.
Confession: I am enjoying watching what many are describing as the Chinese water torture of baseball -- the drip, drip, drip of names from what was supposed to be a secret list of players in 2003 who tested positive for using performance-enhancing drugs. Big Papi and Manny on Thursday. Sammy Sosa in June. A-Rod just before spring training started. Keep them coming, I say, nice and slow.
Live Chat: MLB FanHouse Talks Trade Deadline (1 PM ET)
A lot of folks have suggested they can't stand this anymore. Some of my peers are writing that they want the rest of the 104 names from the infamous list revealed all at once. Hall of Fame slugger Harmon Killebrew told The Minneapolis Star-Tribune the other day that "to have the names piddling out there is ridiculous."
I think this IV-like drip of culprits is the medicine baseball deserves.
After all, baseball has mismanaged its reaction to its drug problem just as badly as it did the drug problem in the first place. The whole reason a list exist is because baseball, specifically the union, failed to trash it as it promised. How did that happen? Was the office paper shredder broken that day? Could it not afford to hire a company to erase a hard drive?
They won't be the last to be identified. There will be more big names dropped too. It is highly unlikely, however, that there will one day be a flood of these names that will cleanse baseball's soul all at once.
Bud Selig would probably prefer that in the best interest of the game. So, too, I suspect, would most of the 1,438 players tested in 2003 whose results were clean. As the Astros' Lance Berkman said during spring training: "The problem with this whole sordid mess is now everybody is questioned."
But the players union won't go for full disclosure, especially after all those years of fighting the exact same thing with the argument that the game wasn't in need of an intervention. Retiring union boss Don Fehr has said as much several times.
Let the names of the guilty continue to trickle out as a constant reminder of how this whole steroids era should not have been handled.The players union, according to Selig's office, is the only baseball organization that has the list, too.
Furthermore, the 97 players who were informed by baseball after the 2003 test that they didn't make the wash certainly don't want their names revealed. Look at Big Papi, the heretofore very likeable David Ortiz. At least twice earlier this year he was all mouth about the need to rid the game of steroids and the like. But Thursday after his name was linked to the list, he went mute. Not talking about it, he told the press, before going out to play (He later released a statement after the game).
That's typical. Forthrightness is not. If Ortiz wanted to be the stand up guy we liked so much he would act like a college caught cheating by the NCAA and impose a penalty upon himself.
The guilty guys don't want to talk, though, or they would have volunteered to do so by now. There are 97 guys out there right now, playing or recently departed from the game, who are living a lie. They are going to fight the truth setting them free. They don't want fans to turn on them. They don't want endorsements to be lost. They want to continue their very rewarding livelihoods. Eventually, they'll be outed, though.
At the rate the list is being divulged -- eight since 2003 -- it'll be almost the year 3000 before the final name comes out. Imagine that? Four generations from now, baseball fans could still be living the lies of the last fifth of the 20th century.
Consider it a curse, not unlike that which haunts the Cubs and even the Red Sox still. Until Thursday, we figured the curse that long hovered over the Red Sox was exorcised after they finally won a World Series again. Now we know the Red Sox succeeded only with juiced hitters in their lineup, Big Papi and Manny. Give them asterisks to go along with their championship rings.
I would rather this not happen to baseball. I like the game. Always have. Proof: I sat through a rain delay Wednesday night at Prince George's Stadium outside Washington D.C., before watching the Bowie Baysox shut down the Connecticut Defenders 6-2. I was in the stands, where I paid $9 for a general admission ducat and downed a couple of Shocktop wheat beers with two slabs of cheese pizza.But that all this bad news is trickling out about baseball seems to me to be a perfect penalty for all those who brought it about, particularly the union and the players it tried foolishly to insulate for so many years from all the drug-use accusations that have turned out to be true.
Let the names of the guilty continue to trickle out as a constant reminder of how this whole steroids era should not have been handled. Let the slow release be a continuing reminder to all those coming into the game about what not to do. Let it go on long enough so that one day baseball suffers an ultimate embarrassment for its arrogance when the Hall of Fame must remove a player from its wall because he was found to be on this infamous list.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-31-2009 @ 4:52AM
jzz3skys said...
It's a Fourth Amendment case that may go to the Supreme Court and I hope it does. For me, the issue is the government's almost unlimited power and resources to pursue any citizen it chooses. It's similar to the government's persecution of Paul Robeson. Regardless of the fact that he was duped by Stalin, he was also targeted for his civil rights activism.
The Fourth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights that guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. The league tested the players in 2003 only in order to learn the extent of the drug problem in baseball, not to determine their "guilt" or innocence or to punish them.
Then the government seized the results as part of the BALCO investigation. Barry Bonds was not on the list of 104, but the government re-tested his 2003 sample and found the presence of steroids.
Yeah, it seems likely that when the government seized the list, Ortiz, like everyone else on it, was informed by the Players Union that the government had their names.
On the other hand, I can somewhat empathize with these Dominican ball players who are raised in poverty in the Dominican and make it to the show in the US where they're treated as heroes. I can understand how they might relish that stature, even if it means dissociating from some questionable, though not illegal, early behavior that they've since foresworn. It's not always hypocritical to be gung-ho against some form of behavior that you engaged in yourself.
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 11:15AM
leoganz said...
Just reason 1,527,652 to hate the Red Sox..............
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 11:30AM
autumnwriter said...
As much as I deplore steroid (and other PED) use by athletes, I have to say that the playerts were double-crossed. They submitted to the tests on condition of anonymity and now that promise is going up in smoke. If the gov't subpoenaed the list, it has a duty to maintain the confdentiality of the list, in accordance with the terms of the court order. Why aren't the gov't leakers being sought out and punished?
Reply
8-01-2009 @ 10:54PM
delinda parker said...
and I bet you think Michael Vick shouldn't be allowed to play football?.....
7-31-2009 @ 11:31AM
Hello Robby Ed said...
LeoGanz your another Yankee lover like the NY Times. Why dont these NY papers out the 10 Yankees who doped, from Clemens, Pettite, ARod we know about to the Johnny Damon, Robinson Cano and Matsui we dont know. I'm from Florida and I love the Red Sox or any other teams who torture the grubby Yankees
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 11:50AM
thetrutheh said...
why is bud selig still the commissioner, he allowed the steroid use to continue despite having knowledge that it was going on. he along with the players are a disgrace to the game.
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 12:00PM
thetrutheh said...
indeed, the names of all players should be disclosed now. why is bud selig being so selective on the names that have been released.
who is he trying to protect???
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 12:05PM
Samin said...
Yankee fans have such short memories:
Yankees Steroid-Users, since 2005
1995: Andy Pettitte, Randy Valarde
1996*: Andy Pettitte, Ricky Bones
1997: Andy Pettite, Mike Stanton
1998*: Andy Pettitte, Chuck Knoblauch, Mike Stanton, Darren Holmes
1999*: Andy Pettitte, Chuck Knoblauch, Roger Clemens, Mike Stanton, Jason Grimsley, Daniel Naulty
2000*: Andy Pettitte, Chuck Knoblauch, Roger Clemens, Mike Stanton, Jason Grimsley, David Justice, Jose Canseco, Glenallen Hill, Denny Neagle
2001: Andy Pettitte, Chuck Knoblauch, Roger Clemens, Mike Stanton, David Justice, Bobby Estalella, Todd Williams
2002: Andy Pettitte, Roger Clemens, Jason Giambi,
2003: Roger Clemens, Andy Pettitte, Jason Giambi
2004: Jason Giambi, Gary Sheffield, Kevin Brown
2005: Jason Giambi, Gary Sheffield, Kevin Brown, Mike Stanton
2006: Jason Giambi, Gary Sheffield, Ron Villone
2007: Jason Giambi, Andy Pettitte, Roger Clemens, Ron Villone
Did your juiced-up team win any pennants/WS during these years?
What? Are Sox cheaters better than Skankie cheaters?
How many times was Mantle given a pass for being a drunken womanizer? Some hero he was.
Reply
8-06-2009 @ 12:40AM
tonytiger18 said...
Hey Samien,
Your embarassment of the revelation of your tainted Red Sox Players is showing.
I have followed the Yankees since the fifties, and you as a red Sox fan seem to know more about the players on the Yankees by year , the number of times that they farted and burped and if they ate fish or meat as well as the number of times they had sex.Incredible!!!!
What I am wondering is why the MLB chose the Red Sox director, Mitchell to do the steroid investigation and NOT YOU.
You seem to have complete knowledge of all the roid users since 1850 that played for the NY Highlanders, later named the Yankees.
It was Michell that revealed most of the roid users that weren't Red Sox Players.
7-31-2009 @ 12:15PM
Bruce said...
Heck, the whole damn league is on dope. And Bud Selig is giving Charlie Hustle (Pete Rose) a hard time about being installed into the Baseball Hall of Fame?
I live just west of Boston and I was very happy to see the Red Sox win the World Series in 2004 and 2007. However, I'm not so happy now. The two World Series wins were won on juice and will forever be tainted. I knew something smelled fishy like a sun baked Boston Cod when the Red Sox won the World Series after 86 years. Now we know where that smell is coming from.
It's time for Bud Selig and the players union to straighten out this steroids mess once and for all, with very long, immediate, mandatory and possibly career ending suspensions for performance enhancing drug use.
And Major League Baseball should install Pete Rose into the Hall of Fame today!
Reply
7-31-2009 @ 6:58PM
donn8kids said...
Someone should tell Kevin that the year 3000 is 991 years away, which is a whole lot more than four generations from now. I think he meant the year 2100.
Reply
8-01-2009 @ 2:57PM
allstarace said...
It appears Blackstone may have actually written a full page article and not alluded to race one time. Difficult to read him thoroughly these days, but I did not notice any of his typical racial bias at first glance........
Reply
8-01-2009 @ 10:32PM
Will said...
Baseball Steroids;
Help me understand something here. If they ask players to take the test to see "if" they needed a policy, and we will not disclose your names. But they did, can't these players file charges against the didclosers? They lied to those players. But the players are taking the heat. Plus, if there where no drug policy in 2003, how did they break any law? Test them now, if they fail, dish out what they deserve, if they pass leave them along and get on with it. Is this so hard???
Reply
8-01-2009 @ 10:56PM
delinda parker said...
funny thats all you can focus on....even funnier that you would still read him although you don't agree with his writings on race. He's a black man who stands proud. Find someone else to read if it offends you.
Reply
8-02-2009 @ 11:06PM
ostellgriggs said...
let see if they use an astrik by these guys like barry bonds. i bet they change the rules
Reply
8-03-2009 @ 10:18AM
ribhav said...
It is absolutely absurd to say that the Redsox deserve asterisks next to their championships. By saying that you're insinuating that they were the only team in the league that had players on steriods. I am confident that teams they played in the post season had players that were juicing too.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 3:34AM
Damien said...
He doesn't talk about race unless it's an issue or might be one... he usually seems pretty fair unlike some other writers with chips on their shoulders.
The only color that matter is green.
And in baseball, if you're not cheating, you're not trying. Willie Mays used amphetamines.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 8:50AM
psolecki said...
At the time of the testing, steroids were not considered illegal. Someone is leaking this information to the press as if it were fantastical, mind-numbing information. It's not. The players were promised anonymity. The union has let them down by not demanding that the leaking of this information be stopped immediately. It is a violation of the players' rights. That the union is not taking care of its players is the big story here.
Reply
8-04-2009 @ 8:54AM
montanese said...
for those claiming "there was no drug policy in 2003", wasn't the use of performance-enhancing drugs still illegal under American law outside certain situations? Since when were baseball players allowed to say, "sure, my game's rules trump your law"?
Reply