As a college coach friend and I were being seated for an early dinner in a mostly empty hotel restaurant overlooking the Detroit River on the eve of the last Final Four, we spied Myles Brand and his wife, Peg. They were sitting alone at a table tucked deeper into the quietude of this large dining room with sweeping windows from which we could all watch the sun set.And we knew Brand was counting the sunsets then. It had been just a couple of months since he publicly disclosed that he was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, a cancer that he said had taken away a quarter of the rest of his life.
So we pushed away from our table and walked over to Brand's. Brand rose, recognizing my friend warmly first, and then he greeted me. He introduced his wife. We all exchanged pleasantries. Brand, speaking even more softly than I recalled, and his wife managed to smile. Then we excused ourselves and wished the Brands a nice weekend in the Motor City.
Brand was 66 then. He was 67 when he died Wednesday.
If anyone epitomized the West African proverb about speaking softly and carrying a big stick, it was Brand -- the philosophy professor who became famous as a college president because he told Bob Knight to take a hike, and then cajoled the NCAA as its president to be accountable for the first half of its favorite phrase, student-athlete.
There is nothing in Brand's early biography to suggest he would become such a famous figure in college sports. He was born in Brooklyn and graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute where, I just learned Wednesday, he played basketball and lacrosse as a freshman. He got his Ph.D in philosophy at Rochester and started his pedagogical career at Pittsburgh. He chaired a department at Illinois-Chicago and became a dean at Arizona. He was an educator and an administrator. He became a vice president and provost at Ohio State before presiding over Oregon and finally Indiana.
It was in Bloomington, Ind., where the rest of us became aware of Brand. It was a year and a day before 9/11. He fired the irascible Hoosiers Hall of Fame basketball coach Bob Knight.Many of us looking at Bloomington from the outside championed Brand for what none of Knight's other bosses dared to do. In Bloomington, Brand was torched in effigy, his home was targeted by an angry mob and he and his wife were spirited away for their own safety by police.
But that isn't the act for which Brand should be remembered when it comes to college sports. After all, that was an act taken against one coach at one school that affected its athletic department and its fans. It wasn't transcendent; it was historical footnote.
Instead, what Brand should be remembered for when it comes to college sports is what he did after leaving Indiana and took the job of running the NCAA. For what he did at the NCAA left an indelible mark on every university under its umbrella. Brand forced college athletic bosses to take some responsibility for the college education of their charges, too.The old philosophy professor reminded money-hungry presidents, athletic directors and coaches that they worked at institutions of higher learning and weren't just makers of future pro athletes. How novel was that?
The old philosophy professor reminded money-hungry presidents, athletic directors and coaches that they worked at institutions of higher learning and weren't just makers of future pro athletes. How novel was that?
Brand was embarrassed about statistics that showed most college athletic departments didn't care nearly as much about the development of young minds as they did the strengthening of young bodies. A survey by the college athletics watchdog group known as the Knight Commission found one year that almost one-third of the teams playing in the men's NCAA Tournament -- 20 out of the 65 teams -- failed to graduate as much as 30 percent of their players within six years.
Brand decided to press NCAA members to make academic performance of athletes as important as athletic achievement. He lobbied for rules not just to force athletes to work toward a degree by threatening them with the loss of their scholarships. More important, he put the onus back on the men and women who romanced parents and guardians all of the country to take their children and turn them into productive and successful adults. For the first time in history, Brand made the NCAA see to it that schools with teams stocked with athletes who failed to graduate, or make progress toward doing so, would be penalized. They could lose scholarships. They could lose the right to participate in postseason play. They could lose access to their outrageous revenue stream.
There is nothing perfect about the Brand plan since he started pushing it about four years ago and finally got it implemented by 2006. A lot of experts on athletics and higher education have picked it apart and criticized it for one thing or another.
But the one thing no one questions is the demand his program put on learning, especially for a class of college students who seemed to be making more and more of a mockery of college education. Brand pointed college athletics back in a direction from which it never should have strayed and he was able to do so bloodlessly. As the Coalition for Intercollegiate Athletics, a national faculty group concerned with out-of-control sports lamented early Thursday morning in a press release: "President Brand's commitment to academic ideals and to guiding college sports towards a mission to support the pursuit of knowledge was an expression of values we celebrate."
The last I saw of Myles Brand was when he and his wife rose from their table and walked by the one at which my friend and I were dining. The Brands stopped and Myles said he hoped to see us later. Then, with his wife holding his hand, he turned and walked slowly down a long curving aisle next to the windows and out of the door.
I don't recall if the sun had set by then; it just seemed like it.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-17-2009 @ 9:09AM
billco122 said...
Outstanding article...thanks Kevin
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 1:07PM
hga52 said...
For all that he did for student atheletes he still allowed 'the rich to get richer' through out his whole term. The BCS and the big conference bias in the NCAA basketball tournament got stronger during his reign. A series of events that was far from benifical for most of the students and student atheletes in this country. Big shools, TV and big money boosters still rule the roost
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 5:15PM
greg said...
May he rest in peace. But does this mean that NCAA will finally punishment USC or even create a real playoff system, instead of the joke they have today?
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 5:47PM
jzz3skys said...
He leaves an indelible brand.
Carl Lewis spoke out on Monday about what the South African federation put that poor athlete through:
"It is your fault," he said accusingly to the South African athletics federation. "She is your athlete in your country and you didn't deal with this before. To put it out in front of the world like that, I am very disappointed in them because I feel that it is unfair to her. Now, for the rest of her life she'll be marked as 'the one'."
Reply
9-17-2009 @ 11:05PM
jzz3skys said...
As a personal tribute this is all well and good, but when it comes down to what Myles Brand stood for, I think it's obvious that he would reject Blackistone's idea that collegiate football and basketball players should be compensated. In fact, he wouldn't even agree that these sports are making a profit for their schools.
The following is from Brand's 2005 interview on NPR. At the 19:04 mark, an e-mailer asks:
Q: I hear such disparate information on this question, I wanted to go to the top. Do the major NCAA Division 1 football teams earn or lose money for their universities?
Brand: That's a very good question. There's facts and myth. The myth is that the vast majority earn money. That is a myth and it's false.
There are about 350 Division 1 schools. About..a little less than 300 play football. Of those, maybe 40 will claim to earn money for their schools. The fact of the matter is that probably only about a dozen do.
So most athletic programs, including the high visibility Division 1s, most of them, when you take everything into account, including facilities, bonded indebtedness, travel, and so on, when you take all that into account, most of them lose money. Which is OK. That's not a problem because what these entities do is that they get money through football and men's basketball and then use that to support the participation of many student athletes in other sports.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4521418
The fact that football and basketball money is used to support the participation of student athletes, including women, in other sports is presumably as much of a stumbling block for Blackistone as it was for Jason Whitlock, who had this job before him. But Myles Brand would disagree and so do I.
Reply
9-20-2009 @ 11:51PM
randallat said...
Miles Brand did not reign in the large conferences and particularly overlooked abuses in the Big Ten (his conference) and at USC He influenced bowl and BCS selections behind the scenes, pushed political correctness at institutions while that should not even have been a role for the NCAA. He saw his role as that of big brother NCAA government much as we see on the national stage. I am sorry for his family and friends but most of the NCAA will not miss his approach.
Reply