Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal said last week that he needs as many as 40,000 new troops in Afghanistan if that increasingly deadly war -- of which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said further ramping up will face rebellion in the House -- can have a chance of being won.The Obama administration's first major legislative effort, an attempt to reform and expand health care coverage, is in dire straits as the president's office has been forced to retreat on its desire for a public option for health care and is continuing to fail to get bipartisan support for what is left of its grand plan.
And it is expected that the next monthly unemployment report scheduled to be released at the end of this week will show our national jobless rate risen to a quarter-of-a-century high of 9.8 percent for September.
In short, this is no time for President Obama to make a special trip to Copenhagen to join his home base of Chicago in its final bid for the 2016 Olympics. Just two weeks ago, Obama even admitted he was too busy with health care reform to go to Copenhagen on Oct. 2 to personally pitch Chicago for the Summer Olympics.
But his office announced on Monday that he would join first lady Michelle Obama in Denmark on Thursday to be part of the Chicago's last dance before the International Olympic Committee.
"I think the president believes health care is in better shape," press secretary Robert Gibbs told the media at a Monday briefing. "I believe he felt strongly and personally that he should go and make the case for the United States."
A two-week international sports spectacle seven years from now makes about as much sense being on the president's agenda at this moment as timeout for tiddlywinks.
It has been pointed out that Obama is simply doing what other national leaders have done. For example, when London was vying for the 2012 Olympics, British prime minister at the time, Tony Blair, and his wife, Cherie, went to Singapore, where IOC members were holed up before casting their final votes, and spent a couple of days glad-handing voters. Two years later in 2005, Vladimir Putin, Russian president then, visited IOC voters to support Sochi's bid for the 2014 Winter Games.
But Great Britain then didn't have the host of problems facing Obama, and Blair was six years rather than nine months into his office. Putin was in his second term as president when he championed Sochi's bid and, while facing many struggles, exercised his broad authority to get done almost anything he wanted.
Furthermore, London is England. It is synonymous with its home country, it is its heartbeat. And Russia had never hosted a Winter Games.
Chicago is but one of our biggest cities with about 2.8 million people. Another 300 million or so of us make up the rest of the United States. What positive tangible impact will a Chicago Games have on, say, Raleigh, N.C.? Did the Salt Lake City Winter Games help Buffalo, N.Y.?
Hosting an Olympics in this country is a municipal or regional concern. It is not a national issue and, as such, certainly not something that should rise to the docket in the Oval Office. We've seen eight Summer and Winter Games in this country from New York to California and in between. A president need not make the Olympics a special case.
Chicago is merely Obama's adopted hometown, too. He was born in Honolulu, no matter what those crackpots among us known as "birthers" have cooked up for us to believe. If Hawaii was bidding for the 2016 Summer Games, I would better understand Obama dropping a day or two worth of work for the nation to hobnob with international sports officials in Europe. But it isn't.
This should be an assignment solely for the first lady, who is as much a part of Chicago as deep dish pizza. She was actually born and reared there. Leave it to her.
What the president is doing is living down to that old Tip O'Neill adage: "All politics is local." This is the president paying off a political IOU to Chicago Mayor Richard Daley's cronies – Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett, all in Obama's inner sanctum -- who helped him get elected to the Illinois Senate (over one of my political mentors and former professor, Alice Palmer) and eventually the U.S. Senate and the White House. It is also a pay off to real estate interests in Chicago, as Ben Joravsky, author of Hoop Dreams and a longtime friend and political writer in Chicago, observed recently in his Chicago Reader blog: "The Olympic plan is perceived by many as a thinly disguised urban renewal project. They worry that Olympic 'improvements' will drive working-class African-Americans from the near south side."
But Chicago honchos are fearful they are going to lose out to the favorite for the 2016 Games, Rio de Janeiro, or one of the second fiddles, Madrid and Tokyo and couldn't care less. So they pleaded, and then some, with the president to step up on their behalf even though it may mean trampling on his near south side base.
This is not about the president spreading himself too thin, either, which is a criticism that has been raised as he has sought to orchestrate an economic bailout, two wars (the Iraq war is ongoing), reform of health care, closing the Gitmo prison by his deadline (he is likely to miss it), etc. This is a case of the president getting himself involved in something that is not worthy of the Oval Office, like the arrest last summer of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. into which the president inserted himself.
And therein rests the danger. Like in the Gates' case, the president is exposing himself unnecessarily to a losing proposition. There is still a lot of animosity towards the United States outing of foreign IOC members stuffing their pockets in Salt Lake City. The president's involvement doesn't make winning the games a slam dunk. As former Vice President Al Gore staffer Chris Lehane told Politico.com on Monday: "If they don't come back with the gold, clearly there will be the same questions that American basketball would get if they don't come back with the gold -- they are expected to win."
President Obama isn't in need of another perceived setback.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
9-29-2009 @ 4:24AM
hmsvictory104 said...
The idea of hosting the Olymics in the United States honestly scares me in this day and age of terrorism and inadequate DHS border and immigration control. I have no doubts that terrorism against the United States is going to take place from now on. Seven years from now, diuring these games, terrorists will certainly have possession of weapons of mass destruction..."smuggled into the United States!" We should not assist them by inviting them into our country and overwhelmisg a system that already is incapable of thoroughly screening each ship and plane and vehicle entering the United States. We are causing a security nightmare. In addition, while security forces are diverted to the Olympics, they will be stretched thin in areas normally covered. We can expect to lose a city, or two, or more; all for the sake of sports. I'm a sports fan; but the Olympics have proven to be not only athletic competition, but politics as well. This just isn't worth the possibility of losing a million or more people.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 1:49PM
teddyo said...
stop being scared, that is not of God. The good book say's "He hath not given you a spirt of fear, but of power, love, and a sound mind.
9-29-2009 @ 5:54AM
larry55956 said...
Blackistone is an idiot!!! His usual bigoted trash has now morphed into politics and he is equaly useless.
This is the sports section, how's about we stay with that and only that.
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 8:39AM
Ilovemystate said...
Ok so Kevin your telling me that illinois doesn't have one of the worst unemployment rates. That getting the olympics wouldn't boost our economy. Well to me it sounds like you have no idea what you are talking about. Its two days and the result could be thousands of jobs for years. How about you stick to writing about sports.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 12:56PM
jblaguski said...
hey buddy:
look @ your history, many cities that have hosted the Olympics have lost millions upon millions of dollars. go do your research...
9-29-2009 @ 8:49AM
terraceinc said...
Kevin Blackistone has hit the nail on the head; and I am very happy that he took the time to point the things out that he did.
It's a joke that Pres. Obama is going to Copenhagen with his wife, more than a dozen former gold medal winners, and God knows who else outside of Secret Service, cooks, hair stylists, "assistants", etc...........ALL on the back pf the taxpayers dollar, no less; I'm sure.
The guy is a rookie in the Oval Office and he has way too many more important issues to be involved with right here in the USA.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 1:55PM
teddyo said...
Obama can make money out of a rock. Let him work his magic like he's doing with the stock market. All I know is my 401k was in the tank now it's doing better.
9-29-2009 @ 8:51AM
David said...
For those of you in California. Nancy Pelosi is putting our troop in danger by not supporting our troops in Afganistan. For all of you that said Iraq was the wrong war and we should be in Afganistan where the Taliban and Al Queda is, if we don't send more troops, we will loose. If we loose, then Al Queda wins and they can continue to ramp up there terrorist plans and bring their terrorist war to our home land.
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 9:24AM
mburke2439 said...
JACK OF ALL TRADES WILL MESS THIS UP> WAR AND ECONOMY ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THIS TRIP> LIVES ARE AT STAKE AND HE IS GOING TO DENMARK AND APPEARING ON TV >>> HE SHOULD CUT OUT THIS BS AND GET ONE JOB DONE RIGHT RATHER THAN SCREW UP 1000.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 8:01PM
agyoungb said...
If he knew how he could do it however, he does not know how but he can take another vacation.
9-29-2009 @ 10:03AM
montanese said...
this is more about Mayor Shortshanks' legacy: one last chance to pass out tons of patronage and insider contracts and fob off the costs as part of the usual over-runs. And hey, if Da Mayer can't call in a favor, what's the sense of being Da Boss.
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 10:03AM
jzz3skys said...
Kevin, are you sure the real reason you don't want the Olympics in America is because that way you and Jay baby won't be able to con Time-Warner out of an all-expenses-paid international vacation on our monthly AOL dime?
Or could it be because you read William Jelani Cobb's piece in Essence magazine, "Blame it on Rio," and so you know that Rio is the #1 sex tourism destination among affluent African American men such as yourself? Just checking.
Your idea that Obama can only represent Hawaii, the place where he was born, is so weird I don't even want to think about it. Apparently the Olympics have a more fluid definition of citizenship than you do.
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 10:29AM
greatqb44 said...
The fact that Obama is going signals that Chicago is getting the Olympics, right? Would Obama go if he hadn't been told that his attendance was the difference-maker? Would the IOC have the nerve to reject the hometown of the president, after every international elite spent the last two years telling Americans to elect this man?
And with allied reinforcements in Afghanistan few and far between, Iran shooting off missiles, trade wars brewing with China, Mexico, and Canada, and Russia ignoring the "reset button," doesn't Obama need a big foreign win right now?
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 12:23PM
sgall23241 said...
I see no harm whatsoever in President Obama going. While I can appreciate your even-handed criticism, Mr. Blackistone (no one on the right's going to accuse you of being in the pocket of President Obama, even tough some will STILL try, it's in their nature, you understand), I think it can only help Chicago's bid. After all, the other leaders of the competition are going to be there, so where's the harm in that? Plus, it's only for a few hours. Certainly, an Olympics can help a city's psyche, and definitely with unemployment in said city. I just hope it'll pay off with a win.
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 2:37PM
Tess :o) said...
Talk about bad timing! It's bad enough that the US is experiencing its worse recession in 30 years and we have men and women stationed in dangerous countries (Iraq and Afghanistan), hosting the Olympics should be the farthest thing on the Capitol Hill radar. Our country played host to the winter olympics in 2002, just eight years ago. Instead of being concerned about bringing the Olympics to Chicago, how about doing something with crime and violent crimes in that city? Didn't some young man died a few days ago due to gang violence? Hope this stupid bid to host fails just on principal!
Reply
9-29-2009 @ 2:43PM
brsdad said...
Don't worry Barry, Nancy and Barney really run this country and I am sure that they will do so while your are jetting off with Oprah and Michelle. By the way Barney wants the Olympics in Amsterdam.
01/20/2013
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 12:10AM
Don said...
Geez. You would think he was going to Tahiti for a month. Come on guys, he is going from Thursday to Saturday. If you really hate the guy at least be honest about it. If Chicago gets the Olympics it is a plus for ALL America not just the Windy City. If he can't be gone for two days we are really in the deep crap! Go Obama (and I did not and will not be voting for him regardless)!
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 4:38AM
jzz3skys said...
One reason "Posh" Blackistone doesn't mention that Oprah Winfrey -- America's good will ambassador -- is accompanying Mrs. Obama to Denmark might be because SHE SMOKES HIM IN THE MARATHON, the only sport we know for sure that Blackistone participates in. *snicker*
Oprah, in her first and only attempt at the 26.2-mile distance, ran a respectable 4:29 at the 1994 Marine Corps Marathon. Thirteen years later, Blackistone ran the same marathon in a time nearly 11 MINUTES SLOWER THAN OPRAH.
Oprah ran the whole distance without stopping. Blackistone's 4:40, on the other hand, AIN'T EVEN JOGGING, it's jogging with LONG STRETCHES OF WALKING. ROFL!
Here's the proof:
http://www.marinemarathon.com/mcm_community/History/Famous_Finishers.htm
Blackistone, Mariotti, and Couch are the three MOST REVILED bloggers on this website and that's their own doing, it's the persona that they choose to project: obnoxious, in-your-face, and condescending.
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 9:44AM
Jim said...
As a person who has been layed off since last November, Right on Kevin! I am still upset about this health care issue and trying to ram this down peoples throats. Like my Grandma and many other have always said, when you try to do too much too soon you are a Jack of all trades and a master of none. Instead of the President being your typical Chicago Politition, how about for once we concentrate on the WHOLE country and what we need and what we need now is jobs. And please, all you idiots out there, no more racist comments. Just remember a white, Republican politition got us into this mess, including Iraq and Obama is doing his best to fix it. Way to go Kevin and glad too see you are back to telling it like it is and not hung up on some of your own strange views you have been expounding lately. Keep up the good work!!
Reply
9-30-2009 @ 12:10PM
denniswayne said...
the last 2 years of Bush were dominated by dems,and thats when the poop hit the fan.crooked and corrupt dems in congress and the senate.