Tom Cable has been, pun intended, cooling off this week. He shouldn't have been no matter this being his Raiders' bye week on the NFL schedule.Instead, Cable should've been in New York at a particular building on Park Avenue sweating in the most magnificent office in the joint -- the NFL commissioner's suite. He should've been there explaining to NFL boss Roger Goodell exactly how his assistant Randy Hanson wound up with a broken jaw after a team meeting last August that a district attorney concluded was the result of "some type of physical contact that happened between Mr. Cable and Mr. Hanson when [Hanson] went down." And he should've been explaining how police wound up asking him about a woman who wound up being thrown out of his home last January.
It shouldn't matter that the Napa County District Attorney Gary Lieberstein refused late last month to charge Cable with battery against Hanson while explaining that "one could say in a textbook manner that a battery had occurred." (Huh?) It shouldn't matter that the police cleared him of any wrongdoing 11 months ago with a former girlfriend.
What should matter is that the league appears to have a coach in its ranks with a temper problem that has hurt others and put the league in a poor light.
Goodell's deliberate handling of Cable's situation makes it appear that he has one set of rules for players and another set for management. Players get the hammer and managers get the brush. That shouldn't be allowed or imagined.
And after Goodell reminded Cable of as much, he would be smart to give the Raiders' coach another week to cool off -- under suspension.
The National Organization for Women president Terry O'Neill on Wednesday told USA Today that Cable should be suspended while his employer investigates the findings of an ESPN report that Cable struck his first wife Sandy Cable 20 years ago and that a former girlfriend Marie Lutz accused Cable of assaulting her as recently as last January.
Twenty years ago Cable was a graduate assistant at San Diego State. He didn't make it to the NFL until three years ago. It would seem overly officious from this seat for the league to punish Cable for a despicable and cowardly act a generation ago when Cable could only dream of coaching on Sundays and the league hadn't even considered a personal conduct policy, let alone implemented one. Furthermore, he's owned up to that incident, although disputing Sandy Cable's claim that his hand was balled into a fist.
In January, however, Cable was the Raiders' interim head coach when Lutz accused Cable of grabbing her and causing her to fall to the ground while pushing her out of his house. It resulted in an investigation from the Alameda Police Department. Cable said he cooperated with the cops and that they cleared him of any wrongdoing. Lutz also claimed Cable hit her several times before that incident.
That needs to be looked into further. And I would understand and expect a suspension of Cable by his employer or the league while both investigate, as they've said they are doing, this latest allegation against Cable of violence against a woman, just 11 months ago. That would seem nothing short of appropriate. And if Cable didn't avail his employer of his most recent visit from the law, I would understand and expect his employer dismissing him post haste.
But it's the commissioner's super slow-mo reaction to Cable's apparent temper tantrums that trouble me the most. After all, we're talking about a man in Goodell who quickly earned the nickname Crackdown Commissioner upon taking over a few years ago from Paul Tagliabue. He didn't wait for the wheels of justice to finish turning. He busted Pacman Jones and Michael Vick and some others, as well he should have, before their judges' gavels came down.
It's been hypothesized that Goodell has been deliberate in dealing with -- or not dealing with -- Cable in the wake of the Hanson case because Cable was viewed as a first-time offender of the league's personal conduct policy. Jones and Vick and the others were recidivists and wound up accused of riotous and heinous acts.
But in the wake of the ESPN report, which came on the show Outside the Lines, it doesn't appear Cable was a one-trick pony. Cable looks to be a multiple offender too. In the past 11 months he's generated two police investigations into allegations of violence and in both instances another person was hurt, seriously in one case and slightly in another.
After all, in coaches we're talking about people entrusted to keep everyone else in control, which means being in control themselves. It is disingenuous to treat them less harshly. New Mexico coach Mike Locksley was suspended last month for 10 days, which covered one game, for an incident in which he allegedly punched and choked a now former assistant, J.B. Gerald.
Goodell has been quick to discipline coaches in the past. He sent Joe Cullen, a former Lions' assistant coach, home for two games in 2006 after Cullen was busted twice in a two week period, the first time for indecent exposure and the second time for drunk driving. Cullen sought counseling and now assists the Idaho State football staff and speaks on behalf of NFL substance abuse director Dr. Sara Hickman to current NFL coaches and staff members about the dangers of alcohol. Upon being hired by Idaho State last February, Cullen said he'd been sober for almost 2½ years.
Goodell's swift intervention in Cullen's life was, no doubt, a wake-up call Cullen badly needed. It probably helped him become the inspirational comeback story that he is.
Maybe a similar intervention in Cable's life right now could spur the same sort of recovery from a temper that erupted a generation ago and apparently seeped again last summer and not long after New Year's. Sending Cable home right now wouldn't just be justified, it could very well be therapeutic.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-06-2009 @ 10:14AM
Dutchthunder said...
It probably has more to do with the 'Plantation' mind-set of the NFL than anything else. The Raiders can't sell Cable.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 3:13PM
jososi said...
Mr. Blackistone,
Your a fool. Suspend him while an investigation is being conducted?. Wrong. You don't punish someone until you have established a wrong doing.
I am sorry, but you have no idea what happened in the Hanson incident. I heard all of these reports about how Cable cold cocked him from behind, from the likes of so-called reporters like you and Nancy Gay. What finally came out proved that whatever happened, it was not anything like what was being reported as verified fact.
I also think the report from the ex girl friend sounds questionable. Not necessarily wrong, but at least looking into BEFORE concluding anything.
I am not saying Cable should escape scrutiny. Quite the opposite. But facts must be established BEFORE punishment is handed out.
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 3:38PM
reikilight said...
Funny how trash writers stick up for one another ... here it is comical that Blackstone is jumping on the Nancy Gay band wagon and convicting someone on publicity seeking BS spin most likely and ready to convict the guy without completing an investigation. Nancy Gay is a GARBAGE writer and Blackstone gets off on trying to be controversial and push buttons ... even when they are way off base. Another STUPID story ... with Kevin being as lame as Nancy! What a joke the internet press has become!
Reply
11-06-2009 @ 6:18PM
Customize said...
If Cable was African-American, Blackistone would be the first to play the race card, but since Cable is a white male, he is obviously guilty, even when proven innocent.
Reply
11-07-2009 @ 8:53AM
hannafanquizz said...
Cable is a punk, he abuses the weaker ones ans sucks up to the stronger ones, typical for cowards!!!!!!
Reply
11-07-2009 @ 1:18PM
MCCappuccio said...
I'm a Cable fan or Raiders fan, but, I think this code of conduct thing is being carried to far. Note, Cable, "hit" or "slap" the two women. He did not them. Moreover, two different women twenty years apart. That's pretty good considering the number of NFL players named in domestic diputes every season. That's means a impertant slap. A quick loss of temper. Maybe, anger management is an option, but, anything else would be political punishment. I wouldn't even think the law would would consider anything else.
Reply
11-07-2009 @ 2:07PM
buford1 said...
The guy he had to be black otherwise Ole Kevin would ot have anything to say about the situation.
Ole Kevin is as racist as Sharpeton and Jackson and is as much an idiot as both. He never writes a story critical of a black guy or woman but he will jmp all over a white guy in a New York minute. We sure do not miss this racist bigot i Dallas.
Reply
11-07-2009 @ 4:55PM
Rob said...
Great piece from Kevin...I totally agree with every word. Cable is out of control and no one seems to want to rein him in. The double standard is appalling. Goodell can't be the Crackdown Commissioner if he is only going to selectively crackdown.
"After all, in coaches we're talking about people entrusted to keep everyone else in control, which means being in control themselves."
Exactly...
Reply
11-08-2009 @ 5:25PM
birchibaldbarlow said...
Interesting. Cable should be suspended for "allegedly" punching a guy, but the same writer thinks the U of Oregon should go light on LeGarrette Blount for openly suckerpunching a guy who "taunted" him. He then proceeded to fight his own teammates, his coaches, assaulted a law enforcement officer, and wanted to get a piece of the students at Boise. Racist writers are a hoot.
11-08-2009 @ 8:59AM
nickcherryl said...
Wonder what the race baiter, Kevin Blackstone would be putting in his report if the guy was black????????????????
Reply
11-08-2009 @ 9:01AM
nickcherryl said...
Second try, wonder what Kevin Blackstone would be reporting if the guy was black???????
Reply
11-09-2009 @ 2:20PM
faces said...
First of all, great piece KB. Secondly, anybody posting comments about how KB is racist needs to put their skewed, bitter perspectives in check. If Blackistone were racist, this piece would've been about how Goddell isn't acting on Cable because he's white and Goddell's swift actions on athletes were because they were African-American. I suppose those naysaying will propose KB is sexist for taking a woman's side to Cable's. Sound ludicrous? That's what I was thinking reading your comments.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 6:56PM
David said...
Fire his ass because he is a horrible coach and the Raiders aren't going anywhere with this guy. Problem is anyone with an IQ above 10 won't become head coach of the Raiders because the organization is dysfunctional. Why can't they win with the talent they have??
Reply
11-14-2009 @ 1:22PM
smag45 said...
OK gentlemen /ladies of the raider nation...lets quit with the racial nonsense and accept the facts...the raiders NEED a coach/staff that can take our team and turn them into winners. You cant have productivity if the ones at the helm are losers.Its that simple !!
Reply