This is the way I spent the intermission of last season's Super Bowl at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, when Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band, and what seemed like a million people, poured on to the football field to perform a medley of The Boss' best hits: I departed my press seat in the stands with some friends to seek a cup of coffee on the concourse and wound up missing the entire halftime show.I couldn't have cared less, either.
I don't go to concerts to see football games and I don't go to football games to see concerts.
So it was greatly underwhelming to me on Thursday when Jimmy Traina of Sports Illustrated's Hot Clicks, citing unnamed sources, reported that what's left of The Who -- the Beatles' era rock band that lots of rock heads will tell you is the greatest rock band ever -- had been chosen to play at this season's Super Bowl halftime show in Miami.
It struck me as anything but surprising, too.
What will make my eyebrows raise is when Super Bowl organizers lift the statute of limitations they imposed on halftime performances after the stupid stunt by Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake at Super Bowl XXXVIII in 2004 at Reliant Stadium in Houston. Five years apparently hasn't been enough.
Indeed, since Jackson and Timberlake dared to, uh, strip the halftime show of its dignity, halftime organizers have refused to invite a contemporary music entertainer anywhere near the game, unless they are contemporaries of baby boomers. So they've served up Paul McCartney at 60-plus, The Rolling Stones led by Mick Jagger at 60-plus, Tom Petty at 60-plus with his Heartbreakers, and The Boss in February at 60-ish.
In between The Stones and The Heartbreakers, Super Bowl censors did allow Prince to perform. It was just a year before he qualified for his AARP card.
I'm not criticizing age. It's growing on me like kudzu. But this continued reactionary policy -- grown from the revival of the culture war this decade by Pat Buchanan -- to what happened five Super Bowls ago is what has grown so old that it's tired.
Who (no pun intended) would've thought that our old national pastime, baseball, would have hipper extra entertainment at its crowning contest, the World Series, than whippersnapper fast football? But that was Jay-Z and Alicia Keys who performed for the Yankees-Phillies' games in New York, busting out that hot "Empire State of Mind" cut.
The antiquated look of Super Bowl halftimes nowadays is probably a reflection of the game's paying audience, too. It isn't the kids who've kept Green Day on the Billboard Top 100 for over a year now who buy face-value $1,000 Super Bowl tickets. It isn't the youngsters who've kept Fabolous and The-Dream on the charts for 40-plus weeks who buy Super Bowl tickets scalped at thrice their face value.
Instead, it's the corporate muckety-mucks and the business partners they want to reward who wind up sitting in most of the seats on that last Sunday of the season, at least most of the good seats in the lower bowl. They can afford the highest-priced ducats and can use the tax write-off.
And who are their favorite music stars? The Who, The Who, The Who, and the like. Wonder if they'll let The Who sing famously:
C'mon, c'mon who? (Who are you? Who, who, who, who?)
Oh, Who the f**k are you? (Who are you? Who, who, who, who?)
The Super Bowl doesn't belong to the loyal every week fan. It doesn't belong to the players, either. They're just a sideshow, unfortunately, taking up three hours out of a weekend of big-money parties and wining-and-dining and schmoozing, and that part of it is a lot of fun, by the way.
The Super Bowl really belongs to business, big business, the biggest that exists on one fell weekend day. The halftime show now reflects what it's shuffling in its MP3 player, not what the players have looping in theirs.
I
f the Super Bowl halftime was reflective of the athletes who sandwich it, the halftime would look and sound a lot different, like it did in 2004 with Jackson and Timberlake. It would be 20-something rappers and crooners and dancers. They'd mostly be heard on urban radio, too, like Sirius XM's Hip Hop Nation.It's almost forgotten now, but Janet and Justin were joined in Houston by rappers Nelly and Diddy (he was P. Diddy then) and the rock-meets-hip-hop star Kid Rock.
That was the last Super Bowl halftime I really paid attention to. I remember it like it was yesterday. I was at my buddy Steve Smith's house, he of Penn State and Raiders' fame and now battling ALS, with his wonderful wife Chie and their kids and their friends, including Tim Brown, of Notre Dame and Raiders' lore. All the guys and all the kids and ladies kind of switched seats when halftime started; we stepped away to the buffet and they took our places.
We all wanted to see Janet and focused in as she did her thing. Then there was some shrieking and a few of us looked at each other and asked if we saw what we thought we did. I suspected right then that that would be the last we saw of today's stars in today's Super Bowl halftime.
Who knows when the ban on contemporary entertainment at the Super Bowl will be lifted? But it can't stay on forever. The lead singer of what remains of The Who, Roger Daltrey, is 65. Who are his peers and peers of The Stones, McCartney, Petty and Springsteen? Is Pink Floyd next? How about Led Zeppelin and The Eagles? Fleetwood Mac? Could Aerosmith, which was the centerpiece of the 2001 Super Bowl halftime show, be an encore possibility following lead singer Steven Tyler's surprise appearance earlier this week at a solo concert of bandmate Joe Perry after having fallen off stage in the summer?
Spare me.
Twenty-somethings at the Super Bowl, for now and the foreseeable future, are for watching in the game, not for listening to at the break.
And that's fine by me. You can have my seat until the second-half kickoff.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
11-13-2009 @ 12:06PM
greatqb44 said...
Did someone tell him Janet was in her 40s? I guess that might take the edge off his old white masters keeping the young hip hop kids down rant
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 6:58PM
into228 said...
HIP HOP IS THE GREATEST MUSIC AFRICAN AMERICANS CREATED.NO ONE WATCHES THE HALF TIME SHOW AND I DOUBT THEY WILL WATCH WHEN THESE OLD CLOWNS THE WHO ARE ON.
11-14-2009 @ 10:02AM
Dvdfrnzwbr said...
Foghat or Grand Funk Railroad, would jake a kick Azz half time show!
11-13-2009 @ 12:34PM
Alex said...
I'm guessin' if they'd chosen Stevie Wonder, MC Hammer or Aretha Franklin, we wouldn't have had to endure this story, right Kevin?
Reply
11-14-2009 @ 9:54AM
mri3iguns said...
umm..yeah..they are old and suck too
11-13-2009 @ 12:36PM
mmdd477 said...
The Who ARE,arguably,the best rock group of all time. Their music has stood the test of time for over FORTY years. Same with "The Boss". I think that Jay - Z and Alicia's song was absolutely hideous. Let's see if they're remembered forty years from now. I severely doubt it !!!
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 2:32PM
hjb3bb said...
im pretty sure jay-z will be remembered 40 years from now dumbass, he has sold more albums than the who
11-14-2009 @ 7:23AM
Jonitia Johnson said...
You are right! I do not even know how Jay Z is, even if he has sold more records than the who.
11-13-2009 @ 12:43PM
Brian said...
Kevin. I am the same age as Janet J. I enjoy listening to accomplished rock icons as opposed to people yelling x-rated nursey rhymes into a mic
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 1:00PM
Chris said...
That's not all rap music is. Please try to delve deeper than the crap played all over BET.
11-13-2009 @ 12:45PM
carlastar26 said...
Ii agree with this article 100%. I havent been able to enjoy a halftime show since JJ & JT. Really, they can forget what happened 5 years ago and move on to today's times...John Legend, JayZ, Beyonce to name a FEW. At least I can use halftime again this year to do dishes!!!!!
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 12:47PM
Beach said...
Just as I thought you are a racist
Reply
11-14-2009 @ 1:35AM
baczik said...
Such a tired lame and I do mean lame argument. If someone disagrees with you, call them a name; in this case a "racist" It has grown tired. It does a real DIS-SERVICE to the men an women who marched in the fifties and sixties, against dogs, fire-hoses, clubs, lynchings, night riders and fire bombs, who survived REAL racism. Some one disagrees with you on music, so there a racist. Why not try something really damaging like na-na- na-na-boo-boo, equally lame.
11-13-2009 @ 12:47PM
hustlinhilbily said...
Ask yourself if you would want your children watching it. If the answer is no, then it shouldn't be on at halftime. Janet's planned malfunction was no big deal to me, and I wouldn't walk across the street to see Springsteen for free, but your particular age group isn't the only one watching the show. Some day you might grow up enough to understand that. Don't feel bad though, it also took us old geezers a while, before we understood that it actually wasn't all about us.
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 12:56PM
jre3651 said...
"...what will make my eyebrows raise...". Really? And you're a journalist?
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 12:58PM
tm3756 said...
i dont think he's racist. i just think he's a lame-o.
blackistone - many young people, myself included, are very excited to see the who perform. the who is one of the great rock bands in history. their music is timeless and will be listened to and cherished long after alicia keys and jay-z are relegated to the dustbin of history.
thank god the super bowl in recent years has turned to time-tested, proven performers and away from flavor-of-the-month pop drivel that will be forgotten about in ten years.
free your mind, old man!
Reply
11-15-2009 @ 7:22AM
Kelly said...
While I agree that The Who is an AMAZING choice and I'm SO looking forward to seeing them play at the Super Bowl (HOPEFULLY in between the Saints whooping up on the Colts! hey, a girl can dream!) I will say that Alicia Keys and Jay-Z are not the crap so many want to claim them to be. They are true professionals of their craft and I do enjoy them. But, I will admit that I will enjoy The Who more than I would enjoy the alternative listed here. But, the Super Bowl is not about "tweens" and pop stars, it's about two teams vying for the ultimate title... the Half-Time act shouldn't be the focus of the game. Seriously, who even played the year Janet Jackson showed her boob? It's sad that THAT is how that SuperBowl is known!
11-13-2009 @ 12:59PM
Chris said...
They were and are good bands, but they're hardly fresh or new. It's good to bring their sound to a younger generation—I was born in 1988 myself and it's nice to be able to see them on stage—but I want to see some new blood out there on the big stage, and I don't think the many, many younger NFL fans would disagree.
You don't need gangsta rappers or teen pop idols out there. There's plenty of good alternative music being produced and most of it is squeaky-clean. There are even rap songs that are actually genuinely GOOD, and without all the misogyny and expletives white people always associate with rap music, as if gangsta rap is all there is to hip-hop.
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 1:01PM
cassidy21 said...
I've never been to a super bowl party where anyone has even paid attention to the half time show. What's the big deal? Oh, and by the way Kevin -- The Beatles - a band that broke up 40 years ago - outsell Jay-Z.
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 7:30PM
jdunnfla said...
So corporate types...mostly men and couples support the Super Bowl by buying tickets and attending the parties...and then we get our kids' music every year during half time??? Writer is out to lunch on this one. Say NO to Rap and Hip-Hop!!
Reply